Facilities Management for Managing Agents | 2026 Guide

1.3 million: ARMA represents over 300 member companies that collectively manage over 1.3 million leasehold properties in the UK, according to Horizon Management, citing ARMA (2023).

Last updated: 3 November 2026

Facilities management for managing agents means procuring, overseeing and reporting on the physical upkeep, compliance and contractor performance of a block or estate on behalf of leaseholders and freeholders. Managing agents collectively oversee more than 1.3 million leasehold properties through ARMA member firms alone, and most now outsource delivery to specialist FM providers rather than running maintenance teams directly.

Key Takeaways

  • ARMA represents over 300 member companies that collectively manage over 1.3 million leasehold properties in the UK, according to Horizon Management, citing ARMA (2023).
  • The outsourced facilities management model accounted for 63.85% of the UK facility management market in 2025, per Mordor Intelligence (2025).
  • A higher-risk building under the Building Safety Act 2022 is defined as at least 18 metres tall or at least seven storeys with two or more residential units, per Falcon Chambers (2024).
  • A substantial number of higher-risk buildings exist across England, each requiring an Accountable Person.
  • The UK workplace and facilities management sector contributes £102 billion to the UK economy, per the IWFM Market Outlook Survey Report 2025.

63.85%: The outsourced facilities management model accounted for 63.85% of the UK facility management market in 2025, per Mordor Intelligence (2025).

What Does Facilities Management Involve for Managing Agents?

Facilities management for managing agents is the coordination of maintenance, compliance and contractor services carried out on behalf of a leasehold block's owners, rather than for a single commercial landlord's own premises. A managing agent is a firm appointed under a lease or management contract to run a residential or mixed-use building day to day, collecting service charges and instructing contractors.

This distinguishes residential block FM from general commercial FM in three ways. First, the managing agent is spending leaseholders' money, not their own, which creates a duty of reasonableness under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985. Second, decisions often require consultation with a resident board or right-to-manage company before works proceed. Third, service charge accounting rules under the RICS Service Charge Residential Management Code govern how FM costs are billed, reported and audited.

A commercial landlord instructing FM for its own office building answers only to itself and its tenants' lease terms. A managing agent instructing FM for a block of flats answers to leaseholders, a freeholder, possibly a resident management company, and ultimately a First-tier Tribunal if charges are disputed. That layered accountability is why FM procurement for managing agents needs tighter documentation, clearer service level agreements, and evidence that spending was reasonable and, where required, consulted on.

Managing agents carry statutory and professional obligations under UK leasehold legislation whenever they procure facilities management services on behalf of leaseholders. Priority First notes that the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 requires service charge costs, including FM contracts, to be reasonably incurred and works to be of a reasonable standard — failure to meet this test can see charges disallowed by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber).

Priority First notes that Section 20 of the 1985 Act requires formal consultation with leaseholders before qualifying works above a prescribed threshold or long-term agreements exceeding twelve months are entered into. Skipping this step can cap recoverable costs regardless of the actual contract value.

The RICS Service Charge Residential Management Code, now in its fourth edition and approved by the Secretary of State, sets the professional standard managing agents are expected to follow. Mairead Carroll, Senior Specialist – Property at RICS, said the updated code "will play a vital role in helping the residential property industry with consistency and application of best practice when handling service charge fees for their...".

Since the Building Safety Act 2022, buildings meeting the higher-risk threshold — at least 18 metres or seven storeys with two or more residential units, per Falcon Chambers (2024) — impose additional duties on whoever is named the Accountable Person. Managing agents are frequently appointed to discharge these duties, which include maintaining the Golden Thread of building safety information and registering with the Building Safety Regulator, part of the Health and Safety Executive (HSE). With a substantial number of higher-risk buildings across England, this is no longer a niche compliance issue for agents managing taller stock (Roberts Environmental).

Should a Managing Agent Handle Facilities Management In-House or Outsource It?

Managing agents face a genuine either/or when deciding whether to run facilities management with direct employees or appoint a third-party FM contractor. The outsourced model held 63.85% of the UK facility management market by offering type in 2025, according to Mordor Intelligence (2025), reflecting a clear market preference.

Factor In-house FM team Outsourced FM provider
Upfront cost High — recruitment, training, equipment Low — contracted service, no payroll burden
Flexibility across a portfolio Limited to one or a few sites Scales across multiple blocks easily
Compliance expertise (fire, gas, asbestos) Depends on in-house training investment Specialist contractor typically holds current expertise
Accountability on incidents Direct, but single point of failure Contractual SLAs and reporting trail
Best suited to A single very large estate with constant workload Portfolios of mixed-size blocks, typical agent book

A managing agent running a small portfolio of mid-rise blocks rarely has the volume of work to justify a direct FM payroll. Outsourcing to a specialist provider spreads fixed overheads across multiple contracts and gives the agent access to compliance expertise — fire risk assessors, gas safety engineers — without employing each discipline directly.

Mo Hassan, Managing Director at Priority First, put the underlying logic this way: "Our clients kept asking the same question: you are already in the building day and night, why am I paying someone else to look after it? Combining security with facilities management is not diversification for its own sake — it is one accountable team for the whole building instead of three contractors blaming each other."

This matters most where a single site already carries security staff. Priority First's work on a mixed-use development in West London — spanning retail, residential and public areas — illustrates the point: facilities and maintenance tasks are tracked on the same platform as security, giving the managing agent one accountable record for the whole building rather than separate logs from separate suppliers.

How Much Does Outsourced Facilities Management Cost, and How Should It Be Recharged?

Outsourced facilities management costs for managing agents vary widely by block size, service scope and whether security or concierge functions are bundled in. A typical range depends on whether the contract covers soft FM only (cleaning, landscaping, waste) or a fuller integrated service including compliance management, maintenance coordination and reactive repairs.

Costs are usually recharged through the service charge account under the terms of the lease, apportioned between leaseholders by the fixed percentages the lease specifies. Priority First notes that the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 requires these costs to be reasonable and, where the long-term agreement exceeds twelve months or the qualifying works exceed the consultation threshold, Section 20 consultation must happen first.

For complex or high-value sites, integrated contracts bundling security, logistics and facilities management command a correspondingly larger budget. An active development in Chelsea and Knightsbridge — combining offices, commercial, residential and construction-phase risk — ran at a cost context of circa £280,000 per year, reflecting the scale of a site where access control, deliveries, plant protection and facilities tasks all run from a single log.

Managing agents should always obtain itemised quotations separating labour, materials, management fee and any subcontracted specialist compliance work (gas, asbestos, fire). This transparency is what the RICS Service Charge Residential Management Code expects when costs are later queried by leaseholders or a tribunal.

Who Is Responsible for Health and Safety Compliance on a Managed Property?

Health and safety compliance on a managed property sits with whoever is named as the Responsible Person under the Regulatory Reform (Fire Safety) Order 2005, and this is very often the managing agent acting on the freeholder's instruction. Fire risk assessments, gas safety checks under the Gas Safety (Installation and Use) Regulations 1998, and asbestos management duties under the Control of Asbestos Regulations 2012 all fall within this scope.

Under the Building Safety Act 2022, buildings meeting the higher-risk threshold additionally require an Accountable Person, who must register the building with the Building Safety Regulator and maintain a Golden Thread of safety-critical information throughout its life, per Falcon Chambers (2024). Propertymark's guidance on the Act confirms this duty can sit with the managing agent where appointed to discharge it on the freeholder's behalf.

In practice, the managing agent typically commissions the fire risk assessment, gas safety certificate and asbestos survey from accredited third-party specialists, then holds the FM contractor accountable for acting on any remedial actions identified. This is where contract wording matters: an FM provider's service level agreement should specify who logs defects, who schedules remedial works, and what timescale applies to high-risk findings versus routine ones.

Priority First's experience on commercial sites with constant vehicle movement and stock exposure shows why a single accountable record matters for compliance as much as for security: when facilities and security logs sit on separate systems, it becomes far harder to prove, after the fact, that a reported hazard was actually closed out.

What Reporting and Performance Metrics Should Managing Agents Require from FM Providers?

Managing agents should require their FM provider to supply structured reporting against agreed key performance indicators (KPIs), not narrative updates alone. Useful KPIs include response time to reported defects, percentage of planned preventative maintenance completed on schedule, compliance certificate renewal tracking, and contractor attendance records tied to time and date stamps.

  • Response time to emergency call-outs, typically measured in hours against the SLA-agreed target.
  • Planned maintenance completion rate, showing the percentage of scheduled tasks closed within the period.
  • Compliance certificate status for gas, fire, electrical (EICR) and asbestos, flagged ahead of expiry.
  • Incident and complaint log with resolution timescales, reviewed at each managing agent meeting.
  • Site attendance evidence, ideally timestamped and photographed rather than self-reported.

This last point is where many managing agents are underserved by legacy FM arrangements. Priority First's platform logs every patrol, incident and handover with a photograph, GPS location and timestamp, so delivered cover on a site is provable rather than asserted — the same principle applies whether the task is a security checkpoint or a facilities maintenance round. On one mixed-use development in West London, this approach took photographed checkpoints from zero to 152 across retail, residential, service yards and plant rooms, live since February 2026, with more than 540 patrols completed in the first five months.

Mo Hassan summarised why this level of reporting matters specifically for managing agents: "Managing agents answer to leaseholders, boards and auditors, so they need a partner who makes them look competent — reports that arrive without chasing, incidents flagged with a proposed fix attached, and a single contact who owns the answer. We treat the agent's reputation as part of what we are protecting."

How Does Facilities Management Software Help Managing Agents Coordinate Compliance?

Facilities management software is a digital system that records maintenance tasks, compliance deadlines and contractor activity in one place, replacing scattered spreadsheets, paper logs and email chains. For a managing agent overseeing multiple blocks, this centralisation is what makes audit trails and leaseholder reporting manageable at scale.

A good FM platform should flag upcoming compliance deadlines — gas safety renewal, fire risk assessment review, lift LOLER inspection — automatically rather than relying on a property manager's memory. It should also log every contractor visit against a timestamp, ideally with photographic evidence, so a managing agent can demonstrate to a tribunal or auditor exactly when a task was carried out.

Priority First operates 24 sites on one platform, up from 18 at the previous count as of August 2026, with field officers and maintenance tasks tracked on the same system so that security and facilities data sit in a single accountable record. This matters for managing agents specifically because leaseholder disputes over service charge spending often hinge on whether works were actually carried out when invoiced — a digital, timestamped record settles that question far faster than a paper file search.

For readers wanting a fuller comparison of how building management, facilities management and security functions relate and where responsibilities overlap, Priority First's guide on Building Management vs Facilities Management sets out the distinction in detail and is worth reading before drafting any new FM tender.

Your Facilities Management Procurement Checklist

  • Confirm the FM contract wording specifies response times, PPM schedules and defect escalation timescales.
  • Check whether Section 20 consultation is required before signing any long-term agreement over twelve months.
  • Request itemised quotations separating labour, materials, management fee and specialist compliance subcontracts.
  • Verify who holds Accountable Person duties if the building meets the Building Safety Act 2022 higher-risk threshold.
  • Ask for evidence standards on contractor attendance — timestamped, photographed records rather than self-reported logs.
  • Review FM and security contracts together to check whether an integrated provider could remove duplicate reporting.
  • Set a re-tender or performance review date into the calendar at contract signature, not left to drift.

FAQ

What is facilities management for managing agents?

Facilities management for managing agents is the procurement and oversight of maintenance, compliance and contractor services carried out on a leasehold block on behalf of leaseholders and freeholders. It differs from general commercial FM because spending is governed by service charge rules under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985.

What is the difference between a managing agent and a facilities manager?

A managing agent is appointed under the lease to administer a building's finances, compliance and contractor relationships on behalf of the freeholder and leaseholders. A facilities manager, or FM provider, is typically the contractor the agent instructs to deliver the physical maintenance, cleaning and compliance work on site.

Do managing agents need to comply with the Building Safety Act 2022?

Managing agents must comply with the Building Safety Act 2022 wherever they are appointed as, or support, the Accountable Person for a higher-risk building. A higher-risk building is defined as at least 18 metres tall or seven storeys with two or more residential units, per Falcon Chambers (2024).

What is the RICS Service Charge Residential Management Code?

The RICS Service Charge Residential Management Code is the professional standard, approved by the Secretary of State, that sets out how managing agents should handle service charge accounting, consultation and terms of engagement. It is now in its fourth edition and governs best practice for FM procurement within service charge spending.

Why do managing agents outsource facilities management?

Managing agents outsource facilities management because an outsourced provider spreads compliance expertise and overhead costs across multiple sites more efficiently than an in-house team. The outsourced model held 63.85% of the UK facility management market by offering type in 2025, according to Mordor Intelligence (2025).

How often should managing agents review facilities management contracts?

Managing agents should formally review FM contract performance at least annually and consider re-tendering every three to five years, or sooner if KPIs are consistently missed. A Section 20 long-term agreement running beyond twelve months also triggers specific consultation obligations that should be reassessed at renewal.

What qualifications should an FM contractor have before appointment?

An FM contractor should hold relevant trade competencies for gas, electrical and fire safety work, appropriate public and employer's liability insurance, and a track record of compliance reporting a managing agent can audit. Where security and facilities services are combined, SIA licensing of any manned guarding staff under the Private Security Industry Act 2001 should also be checked.

Facilities Management Support for Managing Agents, from Priority First

Managing agents juggling compliance deadlines, leaseholder scrutiny and contractor accountability need a facilities management partner who documents everything as standard, not on request. Priority First brings facilities management and security together under one accountable record, which matters most on the mixed-use, high-footfall sites where managing agents carry the heaviest reporting burden.

Priority First protects over £1.6 billion in client assets across prime central London, West London, the West Midlands and Bedfordshire, with every patrol and maintenance task logged to a single platform rather than scattered across separate contractor systems.

If your portfolio needs one accountable partner for facilities management and security, get in touch with Priority First to discuss your blocks and request a tailored quote via the Facilities Management service page.

Written by
Gus — Facilities Manager

Gus is a Facilities Manager at Priority First, looking after the building side of the company's contracts: planned maintenance, managing specialist contractors and the day-to-day running of residential and commercial buildings in London.

Specialises in Facilities management, Planned preventative maintenance, Building management

Add priorityfirst.co.uk as a preferred source on Google